<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Blog (Daily) or Not to Blog (Daily) &#8211; Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infonitum.com/2009/06/to-blog-daily-or-not-to-blog-daily-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infonitum.com/2009/06/to-blog-daily-or-not-to-blog-daily-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Social Media Consulting and Business Content Strategy for a New World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Woods</title>
		<link>http://infonitum.com/2009/06/to-blog-daily-or-not-to-blog-daily-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infonitum.com/?p=279#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting and the compliment, appreciate it!

It&#039;s good to hear we agree on &quot;piggybacking,&quot; although we should try to come up with a new word for it - maybe, &quot;enhancing&quot;? I know there&#039;s a better word for it; when I come up with it, I&#039;ll add it here. I&#039;ve been caught by the &quot;making things clearer&quot; in my posts, too, so I know where you&#039;re coming from on that.

Thanks again for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting and the compliment, appreciate it!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to hear we agree on &#8220;piggybacking,&#8221; although we should try to come up with a new word for it &#8211; maybe, &#8220;enhancing&#8221;? I know there&#8217;s a better word for it; when I come up with it, I&#8217;ll add it here. I&#8217;ve been caught by the &#8220;making things clearer&#8221; in my posts, too, so I know where you&#8217;re coming from on that.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Francis</title>
		<link>http://infonitum.com/2009/06/to-blog-daily-or-not-to-blog-daily-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infonitum.com/?p=279#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks for such a prominent mention! And this is a great post, besides.

I should have been clearer about my &quot;piggybacking&quot; comment. I think you and I actually agree in the way you said it - requiring that they add a viewpoint or opinion. In my original post, I was referring to the &quot;me too!&quot; posts that add nothing but a regurgitation of someone else&#039;s hard work. 

Thanks for reading and nice work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for such a prominent mention! And this is a great post, besides.</p>
<p>I should have been clearer about my &#8220;piggybacking&#8221; comment. I think you and I actually agree in the way you said it &#8211; requiring that they add a viewpoint or opinion. In my original post, I was referring to the &#8220;me too!&#8221; posts that add nothing but a regurgitation of someone else&#8217;s hard work. </p>
<p>Thanks for reading and nice work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
